Documents Reveal Time-line and Plans for “Small Modular Reactors” (SMRs) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) Unrealistic and Promise no Funding

One SMR Design being Eyed at SRS for Use of Plutonium Fuel (MOX) and Production of Tritium Gas Used in Nuclear Weapons
UPDATE of November 21, 2012: No SMR designs teamed up with SRS received the DOE subsidy - SMR companies will have to go through another solicitation process - the "Enterprise SRS" scheme, which is based on SMRs at SRS, faces more troubles
Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA) in Columbia, South Carolina reveal unrealistic plans for pursuit of “small modular reactors” (SMR) at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site, located near Aiken, South Carolina.
The obtained Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) between SMR vendors and the Savannah River Site address three conceptual designs: NuScale, SMR, LLC and Gen4 Energy (formerly Hyperion).
“It’s clear that officials at SRS are caught up in an unrealistic public relations campaign to promote imaginary SMRs at the site,” said Tom Clements, Nonproliferation Policy Director with the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability. “SRS is unfortunately staking its future on development of SMRs when there is little indication that they will be economically or technologically practical. The future of SMRs at SRS is doubtful at best and no amount of public relations spin will make them come true absent sound designs and large amounts of private funding.”
The MOAs indicate that sale of electricity to SRS via “Purchase Power Agreements” (PPAs) is being viewed as a way to fund the reactors. “Sales of electricity produced by SMRs at high rates to SRS would likely be nothing but a back-door subsidy by big government and will not be defensible to the public or Congress,” said Clements.
The main goal of the SMR vendors appear to be a desire to obtain part of the $452 million subsidy that DOE will award in September to two reactor designs.
“It’s time for big government to stop choosing winners and losers among SMR concepts and let the free market decide if SMRs will be pursued,” said Clements. "It's shocking that Governor Haley of South Carolina would support the big-government approach being presented by the Obama Administration over the decisions about SMRs being made by the free market."
The MOA with SMR, LLC for the “Safe Modular Underground Reactor” indicates pursuit of controversial nuclear weapons-related programs. The MOA states that “the Parties agree to invite the NNSA [National Nuclear Security Administration] to discuss the feasibility of additional Agreements to irradiate Tritium Producing Burnable Absorption Rods (TPBARs) and Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX).” These plans refer to the production of radioactive tritium gas used to boost the explosive power of all U.S. nuclear weapons and the use of experimental plutonium fuel (mixed oxide, MOX) made from weapons-grade plutonium surplus to the nuclear weapons program.
Tritium for nuclear weapons is currently produced by the Watts Bar unit 1 reactor owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority. According to ANA, this shows that the U.S. has quietly crossed the imaginary line between the military and civilian nuclear processes and is engaged in a project which undermines sound nuclear non-proliferation policies. “For non-proliferation, safety and cost reason, production of tritium and use of MOX fuel should be ruled out for any SMRs,” said Clements.
SRS is engaged in an intensive promotional campaign to secure SMRs at the site in spite of the fact that they only exist on paper, no design is licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and sources of funding for development and construction of the reactors have not been identified. This effort by SRS to present itself as a leading SMR candidate site is in parallel with the overly enthusiastic media campaign by SMR vendors to promote their specific models, according to ANA.
“While SRS may superficially appear to present certain attractive aspects for the location of SMRs, the site has not had experience with operation of nuclear reactors in over twenty years and has no current expertise in reactor operation,” said Clements. “While DOE is set to chose two SMR designs to fund for further development, SRS affirms that no construction funds will be provided, leaving vendors with the difficult and perhaps insurmountable task to find private funding for SMR construction.”
Two of the three separate “Memoranda of Agreement” for three different and still hypothetical SMR designs include deployment timelines which are already admitted by DOE to be inaccurate since they were signed less than six months ago.
As SMRs are being promoted for overseas markets, SRS officials will not say what plans are for used reactor vessels or highly radioactive spent fuel which would be taken back to the production site.
“If SRS would become a nuclear waste dumping site due to involvement in SMR programs, this is something that the public in the Aiken area and in South Carolina will soundly reject,” said Clements.
###
The three MOAs obtained by ANA include agreements with SRS and the following vendors:
SMR, LLC (http://holtecpower.com/) – signed December 2011
http://www.ananuclear.org/Portals/0/SMR,%20LLC%20MOA.pdf
NuScale (http://www.nuscale.com/) – signed March 2012
http://www.ananuclear.org/Portals/0/NuScale%20MOA.pdf
Hyperion Power Generation (now Gen4 Energy,
http://www.gen4energy.com/) – signed December 2011
http://www.ananuclear.org/Portals/0/Hyperion%20MOA%20.pdf
Additional Blog Posts (1 - 20 of 35) Next Page
SRS Plutonium Fuel (MOX) Program Life-Cycle Cost Surges to Over $20 Billion
By Thomas Clements - Mar 25Cost Increases Underscore Deepening Management Failure of MOX Program Columbia, SC – The amount of money left to be spent on the Department of ...
MOX Madness: A Year Late and a Few Billion Short, DOE Releases Utterly Misleading 2012 Plutonium Fuel “Report” - MOX Program Begs to be Cut
By Thomas Clements - Mar 082012 MOX "Report" is Insulting to Congress and the Public Alike; More of the Same Expected for 2013 as the Project is Smothered by Cost Overruns Se...
Don't Waste Aiken to Hold Forum on Spent Fuel Storage at the Savannah River Site, Feb. 28 - Will You Consent to be Dumped On or Not?
By Thomas Clements - Feb 27UPDATE of March 1: Almost 100 people attended the public forum in Aiken, SC on February 28. Response to the presentation by Mr. Alvarez was ...
GAO Confirms Massive $2 Billion Cost Increase for Plutonium Fuel (MOX) Plant at Savannah River Site – NNSA Outed by GAO
By Thomas Clements - Feb 14Sacré Bleu! NNSA Cover-Up of Massive Cost Increase of MOX Plant Blown by GAO – Ooopppsss! Cost Estimate Leaps 30% in One Step, Signals that the ...
MOX Construction at SRS Faces Suspension in Sequestration According to Exchange Monitor
By Thomas Clements - Jan 31NNSA/AREVA MOX Boondoggle: Farce, Satire or Simply Tragedy? Time for self-proclaimed fiscally conservative groups like "Heritage Action" to sink ...
Vogtle Nuclear Reactor Still Stranded in Savannah; Pouring of “Nuclear Concrete” for Reactor’s Basemat Delayed Yet Again as Embarrassment and Costs ...
By Thomas Clements - Jan 22January 19 photos of reactor and area of rail line used for the failed transport of December 15 are linked below UPDATE of January 23: Schnabel ...
Representative Markey "Perturbed Over Problematic Plutonium Plan" at the DOE's Savannah River Site
By Thomas Clements - Jan 14News release on Rep. Markey's website about the $7-billion Shaw AREVA MOX Services plutonium fuel (MOX) plant debacle at the Savannah River Site ...
SRS Clean-up Board to Meet in January, Radioactive Waste Management Problems and Spent Fuel Storage Schemes to be Raised
By Thomas Clements - Jan 04The Department of Energy (DOE) has formally announced the next meeting of the Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board (SRS CAB) – on Monday, ...
SRS Projects in “Red Zone” Push Site Over its own Fiscal and Management Cliff; Plutonium Fuel (MOX) Leads the Way into Abyss
By Thomas Clements - Dec 19UPDATE - January 1, 2013 - Senator Lindsey Graham again dodges making a commitment to deal with the debt being caused by DOE right in his home ...
Governor’s Nuclear Council to Address Nuclear Spent Fuel Dump at SRS
By Thomas Clements - Dec 11Spent fuel dump at the Savannah River Site likely to face stiff opposition in Aiken The South Carolina Governor’s Nuclear Advisory Council (NAC) ...
SRS Plutonium Fuel (MOX) Plant Continues to Spin Out of Control: Cost Jumps to $7.7 Billion, with Three Year Delay
By Thomas Clements - Mar 20NNSA Cover-up of MOX Cost Overruns Continues at Congressional Hearing Three-Year Delay Spells Doom for MOX Madness Columbia, South Carolina - ...
-
Small Modular Reactors (SMR) Win the Golden Fleece Award
By Thomas Clements - Feb 27As management at the Savannah River Site (SRS) has been pushing the idea that speculative “small modular reactors” (SMRs) will be the salvation of ...
Environmental Document for Plutonium Fuel (MOX) Project at SRS Delayed Again
By Thomas Clements - Feb 26Intervenors against MOX license get positive reaction from NRC licensing board – hearing set for May 21 Annual MOX report by NNSA required to ...
Production of Tritium for Nuclear Weapons to be Addressed in Draft EIS; SRS has Key Role in Nuclear Weapons due to Tritium Processing
By Thomas Clements - Feb 07U.S. Non-Proliferation Policies Undermined by Production of Nuclear Weapons Materials in Commercial Reactors A draft environmental document on ...
MOX on the Rocks: DOE Assessment of Plutonium Fuel Project at SRS Shows Chronic and Uncorrected Cost and Schedule Problems
By Thomas Clements - Jan 24Problem-Plagued MOX Program Merits an In-depth Investigation by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) --- UPDATE of February 13: The Project ...
Vogtle AP1000 Nuclear Reactor Vessel Discovered Unprotected, Stranded in Savannah Port since December 15 Shipment Failure
By Thomas Clements - Jan 14See Update of January 22: Vogtle Nuclear Reactor Still Stranded in Savannah; Pouring of “Nuclear Concrete” for Reactor’s Basemat Delayed Yet Again ...
Support for SRS Clean-up Funding, Spent Fuel Storage Concern by Hilton Head Island Newspaper
By Thomas Clements - Jan 08Opposition grows to radioactive spent fuel storage in South Carolina UPDATE of January 11, 2013: DOE has today issued it's report "Strategy for ...
Meetings Set on Multi-Billion Dollar Vogtle, VC Summer Nuclear Construction Projects; More Delays in Reactor Foundation Likely
By Thomas Clements - Dec 28UPDATE: On January 16, a draft "license amendment request" (LAR) by Souhtern Company related to the Vogtle AP1000 basemat was posted in ADAMS ...
Faulty Plutonium "Glove Box" Received at $7-Billion MOX Plant Construction Project at SRS
By Thomas Clements - Dec 17NRC on plutonium fuel pellet glove boxes: "An additional seventeen glove boxes previously received are being reviewed for similar issues." In an ...
-
City of Aiken Passes Bike Master Plan
By Thomas Clements - Dec 04The Palmetto Cycling Coalition reports in its December 2012 newsletter, the Palmetto Spokesman, on progress by the City of Aiken is supporting ...